The following was written as an answer to an 8-marks question in Fluid Mechanics for a 4th Semester exam of the VTU. It is believed said student was able to clear the paper in only the seventh attempt with “just pass” marks by providing a different answer to “Explain the use of Fluid Mechanics in your life.” This open-ended question was, however, not a part of the syllabus.
Q:Explain the use of Fluid Mechanics in your life or solve ?3.5? .(8 marks)
A: This is a deep experiment:
“Experiment
It’s widely accepted that messrs Modi and Tytler were involved in a planning
capacity at the least for their respective little pogroms. (Genocide is
a stupid and incorrect comparison. We must pray quietly, yet, fervently, to whatever
gods or narcotics we believe in that these guys will never have the opportunity
to command a true army. Mobs of constipated and untrained men and women in the 18 to 35 stupid
demographic are considerably
less effective than a fully armed and trained fighting force that has tanks, machines and hyphenated weapons.) The same can be said of the reactionary mobs and bombs that came out in India’s cities venting anger over the demolition in ’92 at Ayodhya. And, of course, the reaction to reaction and Dawood Ibrahim.
This is a self explanatory picture that doesn't require explanation or elaboration to meet an arbitrary word count target set by the author
Observation
Note Sajjan Kumar, Tytler, and Narendra Modi are still not only men of stature in their party but
have also been democratically re-elected post said acts of violence. Democracy is often confused by TV to mean
moralistic, it isn’t. Democracy is just the voice of the majority of those who want to be
heard. That means people. People are stupid, especially poor people. Middle class people
are known to be stupider since they pay selective attention to both history and religion.
And rich people are the worst. Because while they have the power
to buy and sell the opinions and products to everyone around them,
they often buy and sell the wrong opinions. Dawood and those who led the mobs from the mohallas in ’92 are also doing quite well. Note that those who haven’t really instigated mobs
or been involved in
various scams and committed other heinous acts are not long-lived in politics (or other pursuits in life.)
Inference:
Demagogery breeds a better automobile driver, pedestrian, immune system, bullet proof vest.
It must. Either that or they just don’t publish the right things in newspapers anymore. Note, no scam accused politican in recent
memory has had an accident or a hip fracture or even a well deserved Herpes infection. It’s almost as if a twisted God is watching out for “them”.
And the mob once arrested sublimates into innocent young civilians.
This secular God does not discriminate, and forgives freely. It isn’t a phenomenon limited to a country or a time period.
For Eg: Several assasination attempts on Hitler and Stalin failed. The first American President to fall to an assassin was the one who eradicated slavery…go figure.
Now how can one use this information? Here’s how we can use the ontological proof of a God who loves mobs and demagogues. The next time a smoker goes to the doctor I want to hear a doctor say “Go, start a riot, you’ll be fit as a fiddle” (the healthiest of musical instruments). The next time a kid brainwashed into believing his 10th standard exams are the most important thing in his life is praying, I want him to be able to find solace by hoping for a quick spot of sectarian violence. This also explains several other occurrences that religion has often explained away with a curse of the cat people like catechism “God(s) works in mysterious ways” is an ambiguous answer to most genuine queries made of religious figures, figurines and priestly pretenders.
But rest assured, the gender, number, form, and species of this God of Large Angry Mobs is still up for debate. So there’s plenty of hypothetical shit left to kick around. I know this isn’t the answer to your question, but if you can ask a question out of syllabus, Prof Sharma, I can give you a far out answer. Deal with it. “The winning answer to this question was a colored vertical section drawing of a kidney.
